|
The highly irregular enclosure shape of the KEF Q9C adds
interest to what can often seem like a plain rectangular box, but the main
beneficiary of such an unorthodox shape is the sonics, with the lack of
parallel surfaces assisting the dispersal of internal resonances. The real
interest here, however, is the Uni-Q driver, cleverly faired in to the
enclosure. With the tweeter at the centre of the dome, sound is well
integrated, both on and off axis. The usual deep interference notches around
crossover are missing, and with a single bass unit, there are no interference
effects between adjacent bass drivers. Finally, the room is energised by a
sound that is as stable and as accurate as the direct axial sound.
What this adds up to in practice is an extremely clean, open
and vivid account of the centre-channel information. Intelligibility is a
strength, but most remarkable is the liveliness, accurate tonality and the lack
of obvious colourations. The whole effect is one of lightness (which is not to
say that the low-frequency end is noticeably deficient) and vitality. With the
Q9C it happens virtually anywhere in the room, with little detectable falloff
from oblique listening angles, exactly as promised. The Q9C delivers superbly
then, and stands as remarkable value for money.
Grouptest conclusion
With loudspeakers of any kind, the skill of the individual
designer is as important as the minutiae of the design itself. Perhaps more so.
It is possible - indeed likely - that matching the voicing of your intended
purchase to the rest of the system will overturn all other considerations. The
lowest ranking speaker in the group could very well be the one that suits your
system best.
But it is possible to hazard certain general observations
about the speakers featured in this test. First and foremost, there appears to
be a link of some kind between wide dispersion and perceived sound quality. The
KEF Q9C centre and the Mirage Omnisat, and in its very different way the Energy
Connoisseur Series C-R3 surrounds, achieve wide, even dispersion in very
different ways, but all manage to come out with excellent, impressive results.
There is something refreshingly open and vivid about such speakers, and as a
result they did well in this test. The more directional surround speakers can
still deliver the goods, but are usually best avoided in narrow rooms, where it
is not possible to put much distance between the listening position and the
speakers. More generally, there is a predictable link between price and sound
quality in the case of the centre speakers. Intriguingly though, this is less
true of the surrounds.
Ask yourself whether your system is likely to be used with
movies more than music. If so, then dipole designs may be your best surround
sound bet. And if your stereo pair are basically old, be prepared to upgrade
these to match the qualities of any new centre/surround configuration.
|
|
SPECIFICATIONS
Drive units: Two-way Uni-Q unit with 165mm synthetic
moulded cone bass; 19mm aluminium dome tweeter
Enclosure type: Sealed box
Frequency response: 50Hz-27kHz +/-3dB
Crossover frequencies: 2.8kHz
Sensitivity: 91dB/m @2.83V
Impedance: 8ohms nom
Power handling: 120W programme
Dimensions: 200(h) x 480(w) x 270(d) mm
Weight: 6.1kg
Finishes: Black ash, maple or dark apple vinyl
wrap |
|
FEATURES
Enclosure type: Sealed
Power handling: 120W
Drive units: Two-way |
|