PROG ROCKS
Progressive scanning is a hot potato in the AV
world. But what exactly is it, why is it so desirable and how do you get it?
Danny Phillips explains all
Progressive scanning has been hyped as a miracle
cure for poor-quality pictures. Several DVD players and TVs now sport the 'progressive
scan' tag, the words emblazoned on their fascias. The technology has generated
a huge amount of interest, not least from cinephiles keen to find out about
the 'remarkable stability' and 'amazing precision' it lends to images.
But while prog scan may seem like a revolutionary,
new-fangled technology, its implementation in AV equipment is the only new thing
about it - the actual idea is as old as film itself.
INTERLACED SCANNING
In order to explain progressive scanning, we first
need to discuss interlaced scanning. This is the usual method of displaying
TV images, and was introduced in the 1930s to suit the best display technology
available at the time - the cathode ray tube (CRT).
In a CRT display, a stream of electrons is generated
by a gun, and is scanned across the face of the tube in scan lines, left to
right and top to bottom. The face is coated in phosphors, which glow when hit
by the electron stream. A method of scanning was required that would reduce
the transmitted TV picture's bandwidth and work in accordance with the electricity
supply frequency (50Hz in the UK and Europe and 60Hz in the US). The result
was interlaced scanning.
The method involves splitting each TV frame into
two parts, called 'fields'. Each field contains half of the scan lines of a
frame. The first field consists of the odd lines, and the second is made up
of even lines. The even lines are interlaced between the odd ones to 'fill in
the gaps'. In the 50Hz PAL system, each TV frame lasts 1/25sec, with the electron
gun scanning each field in 1/50sec.
Although interlaced scanning produces perfectly
good pictures, there are some inherent problems with the system, many of which
can be exaggerated on larger displays. The main drawbacks are visible line structure
and flickering caused by rapid switching between the two fields. Another drawback
is 'combing' (also called 'staggering' or 'jaggies'), which occurs during camera
movement when objects are in a different position from field to field, lending
them a staggered appearance.
With progressive scanning the frames are not split
into two fields of odd and even lines. Instead, all of the image scan lines
are drawn in one go from top to bottom. This method is sometimes referred to
as 'sequential scanning' or 'non-interlaced'. The fact that frames are shown
as a whole makes it similar in principle to the way film is shown at the cinema.
Compare the smoother
progressive scan image (top) with the interlaced version beneath it |
The type and number of displays which are able
to show progressively scanned images is limited to non-interlaced devices such
as LCD, DLP, D-ILA and plasma screens, although a number of CRT TVs and projectors
will accept a progressively scanned signal via component video inputs (from
a DVD player). These are not the same as progressive scan TVs (see later).
Progressive NTSC displays can show 60 frames in
one second, rather than 60 fields. As a result, many of the artefacts caused
by interlaced scanning are reduced or eliminated by progressive scanning. In
short, images are more film-like, with smoother vertical resolution and less
visible scan lines.
Many TVs offer 100Hz scanning, which is considered
an alternative to progressive scan. Most TVs have a refresh rate of 50Hz and
display each field in 1/50sec, a rate slow enough for flickering to be noticed.
But TVs with 100Hz scanning can display both fields twice in the same period,
effectively upping the refresh rate to 100Hz. These TVs digitise the two fields
first and store them in a memory chip. The advantage is a complete absence of
flicker, although interlaced scanning artefacts are still visible.
FILM-TO-VIDEO TRANSFER
To understand how progressive scanning improves
the picture quality of movies on DVD, it's essential to know how film is transferred
to video. Films made for the cinema are shot at a rate of 24 frames per second.
When transferring film to the UK's 625-line PAL video system, the frame rate
is increased to 25 frames per second. This incurs a barely noticeable four per
cent increase in speed. Each film frame splits into two video fields, which
fits perfectly with PAL's field rate of 50 fields per second.
The process gets more complicated with NTSC, which
operates at a rate of 30 frames per second (or 60 interlaced fields per second).
You don't need to be Carol Vorderman to know that 24 film frames into 30 video
frames won't go, and speeding up the film to match the NTSC frame rate won't
work, as the increase would be unbearably obvious. To solve the problem, what's
known as '3:2 pulldown' is required. This describes the sequence that fields
need to be shown in to make 24 frames fit into 60 fields.
The process of 3:2 pulldown involves showing one
film frame using three fields, with a duplicate providing the extra field. The
next frame comprises the usual two fields. This pattern is repeated, such that
24 film frames fit into 60 fields (or 30 video frames) every second.
Squeezing 24 film frames
into 30 video frames is achieved by repeating fields in a 3:2 sequence |
The problem is, when the image moves from the last
field of a frame split into three and the first field of the next frame, any
differences between the two frames will cause ugly artefacts such as twitching
or feathery edges. The 3:2 pulldown process is not perfect, and the artefacts
it creates are part of the reason why progressive scan DVD players are causing
such a buzz.
THE CONDENSED VERSION...
Televisions create images by scanning a beam
of light across the phosphor coating on the face of the cathode ray tube.
This is done in two sweeps which creates two fields, each lasting 1/50sec.
These fields are interlaced to produce a single frame of 1/25sec duration.
It's the slight difference between the fields that causes flicker, visible
line structure and artefacts such as feathering (jagged edges) and shimmering
horizontal lines.
With progressive scanning each frame is produced
by a single sweep lasting 1/25sec. This eliminates flicker and artefacts,
and reduces line structure. The most common sources of progressively scanned
images are selected DVD players, high-end TVs and camcorders. At present
only NTSC-compatible DVD decks with component video connections can output
progressively scanned material. Prog scan is not available from PAL discs
because of an as-yet-unresolved licensing problem.
You do not need a prog scan TV to watch prog
scan DVD images, but you do need component video inputs or a non-interlaced
display device such as an LCD projector or plasma screen. Prog scan TVs
are not as effective as prog scan DVD players. |
DVD PLAYERS
The MPEG2 format on which DVDs are based can handle
interlaced or progressive sequences, but most DVD players are only designed
to output interlaced video. When a DVD is encoded from a movie source, a flag
is inserted into the MPEG2 bitstream which instructs a normal DVD player to
repeat certain fields.
Progressive scan DVD players take a different approach.
The full frame is constructed from the even and odd fields, and this time the
complete frames are repeated in a 3:2 sequence, using a duplicate of a full
frame to make up the groups of three.
This irregular pattern creates a slight problem,
though - every other frame lasts one 1/60sec longer than those in between, which
causes a slight judder. The most important task the progressive scan player
must perform is to detect and compensate for the 3:2 pulldown sequence of NTSC
video, as outlined above. It has to identify which fields have been duplicated
and included to make up the 60-field sequence.
Once this has been achieved recreating the frames
to resemble their original film state is simple. The player ignores the extra
fields, takes two fields from each film frame and compiles a full progressive
frame from them.
Some (high-end) TVs which are described as progressive
scan sets have a built-in deinterlacer (or line doubler). The progressive scan
in a TV performs the same function as that in a DVD player - it scans each frame
in one single sweep instead of two separate fields. Prog scan TVs are not as
effective as DVD decks because one, they are not equipped to process in a 3:2
sequence, and two, all the 3:2 pulldown processing is performed digitally in
a DVD deck - there is no chance of any analogue jaggies affecting the image.
PROGRESSIVE SCAN IN THE UK
There are a number of DVD players in this country
that are capable of outputting NTSC progressive scan video. Arcam's FMJ DV27
and Denon's DVD-2800 are two recent examples, but Arcam's player is unique in
that it can also process PAL video signals progressively. However, concerns
over copy protection mean that the technology is yet to be licensed for use
with the European 50Hz/ 625-line signals.
But it can only be a matter of time before progressive
scanning universally supersedes the antiquated interlaced method. Its benefits
are clear, and the proliferation of progressive scan products is an indication
that we're in for a flicker-free future.
|